Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4764 14
Original file (NR4764 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TAL
Docket No: 4764-14
8 April 2015

 

This is in reference to your Application for Correction of
Military Records, DD Form 149, in which you requested removal of
entries regarding desertion from both your Official Military
Personnel File (OMPF) /Navy record and the records maintained by
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), National Criminal
Information Center (NCIC) .

Following a preliminary review of your record it was noted that
there is no reference to “desertion,” and as such, your request

for removal of type documentation is not warranted. Your record
does, however, reflect a 531 day period of unauthorized absence
that was presumably reported to the FBI. In this regard, be

advised that the Board has no authority to either expunge or
redact FBI reports and/or records, or to recommend changes to a
“national database.”

AS a result of the foregoing, no action is required by t
Board. Accordingly, your case is hereby administrative
without action.

 

Sincerely,

   

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10246 12

    Original file (10246 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record contains correspondence from the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 13 July 1994 which states, in part, that the DD Form 553 (mark of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05586-07

    Original file (05586-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2008. On 20 August 1982, after consulting counsel, you requested an other than honorable (OTH) discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the charges of desertion and UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03743-08

    Original file (03743-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the period from 26 June. The Board also considered the medical documentation submitted in support of your case. It also appears that your fraud continued when you enlisted in the Army National Guard by obtaining a waiver of your physical disability while serving in the Marine Corps and, by omission of your service in the Navy, which included the diagnosis of a severe personality disorder and nonrecommendation for reenlistment, both resulting in the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061636C070421

    Original file (2001061636C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NJP was imposed against him at Fort Leonard Wood on 6 November 1972 and his punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay and restriction. Inasmuch as his records were at Fort Hood and they were not notified until much later, the applicant’s records continued to contain the documents and entries indicating that he had been dropped from the rolls. The Board has also reviewed the applicant’s record in regards to his desire to be awarded the GCMDL.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02269-02

    Original file (02269-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. You were convicted by general court-martial on 14 March 1955 of the offense of desertion, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for one year and six months, total forfeiture of pay and allowances for that period, and to be discharged with a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011575

    Original file (20090011575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his records contain a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 9 July 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 in lieu of a court-martial with an undesirable discharge, characterized as under other than honorable conditions. However, his record contains a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 9 July 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002773

    Original file (20110002773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ADRB review shows: a. a CID Report of Investigation (ROI), dated 15 March 2004, indicated the applicant was charged with reckless driving resulting in personal injury, negligent homicide, and reckless driving (all acts occurring on 13 August 2003); b. the specific facts and circumstances leading to his discharge were not in the available records; and c. a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) was on file that indicated he was discharged on 2 September 2004...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00944-07

    Original file (00944-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 27 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. For the reasons noted below, we recommend that the Board deny Applicant’s requested relief.3. The requirements in effect at the time require NCIS to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002532C070205

    Original file (20060002532C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CIC) letter, dated 5 August 2005, responding to her request for release of information. The CID Report of Investigation indicated that the applicant was being investigated for wrongful use of hallucinogens. The applicant submitted a CID Report of Investigation 0065-01-CID137- XXXX0, dated 11 July 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011046

    Original file (20110011046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. The applicant requests that an arrest and conviction for an Article 128 (assault) contained in the FBI's NCIC Database be removed. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.